Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleIglesia ni Cristo was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 11, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 15, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 20, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 27, 2014.
Current status: Delisted good article

Use of the cross symbol?[edit]

Can anyone mention whether or not Iglesia ni Cristo uses the cross as a symbol in their literature and buildings? -- Joseph Eisenberg 2601:1C2:1900:F2A0:4C60:990A:57FB:B828 (talk) 18:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see that there is an article on what appears to be the official denomination website which says that the cross is not found in their buildings: https://www.pasugo.com.ph/on-using-the-cross-and-graven-images-for-worship/ -- Joseph Eisenberg 2601:1C2:1900:F2A0:4C60:990A:57FB:B828 (talk) 18:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There was this historical phenomenon where INC once used cross in their official logo. There was also a sighting of a cross in one of their old worship buildings located in Nueva Viscaya.
Logo
https://www.reddit.com/r/exIglesiaNiCristo/comments/xap4g7/sword_or_cross/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
Worship Building
https://www.reddit.com/r/exIglesiaNiCristo/comments/xehzfr/is_that_a_cross_on_an_old_iglesia_ni_cristo_chapel/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Lightshader (talk) 22:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Reddit is not a reliable source. Dgndenver (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2022[edit]

Under Controversies > Abductions and murders:

First paragraph, first sentence. Change "have gone missing" to "went missing". It's in the wrong tense.

Second paragraph, second sentence starting "Villocino". Change "Villocino has" to "Villocino had". The activity is no longer being conducted.

Second paragraph, third sentence starting "Several". Change "the abductions committed" to "suspected abductions, allegedly committed" to remain impartial when a statement is not objectively true. 81.97.185.1 (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 DoneSirdog (talk) 23:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Choir member opening prayer[edit]

Please 151.210.166.129 (talk) 04:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2023[edit]

im edit for the inc sources Johntimberlake08 (talk) 00:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RudolfRed (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]